Sunday, December 06, 2009

Story Tellers

The Body's Ways to Express Traumatic Memories & Feelings That Can Find No Other Outlet


I am totally disabled (though I often look fine) and the crash is always inevitable. My M.S. is in flare after every activity and all the overlapping syndromes that come with it. Sleep can't come fast enough - but the guilt & blame are right on top of me immediately.

I lay in bed - which is where I am most of the time; upset that my children don't have a better put-together mother; and I think about what brought me to this point. I was exposed to a lot of toxins at my last job and coupled with a lifetime of emotional verbal, psychological, sexual & physical abuse, repressing my anger and "not telling" (aka - being a good girl) -- my immune system snapped. My body snapped along with it. Pain for me is endless & relentless.

I spend a lot of the time I am not with my kids - coping with what illness is doing to, has done to or may do to me. I get so fed up with being told to "just get over" my PTSD issues, as if it was that easy. I was in denial for years that I had PTSD until I was purposely and maliciously used & traumatized almost 4 years ago by someone I cared for very deeply. It was and continues to be a betrayal of the worst kind. I am no longer in denial over what was done to me or my PTSD. Repression is not healthy and I won't go down that road again.

Studies have reported a greater incidence of severe experiences of victimization from emotional and physical abuse in patients with fibromyalgia than in the general population. Most often the abuse originated from family or partners.

This suggests that post-traumatic stress syndrome or chronic stress may play a strong role in the development of this disorder in some patients. Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is an anxiety disorder that is a reaction to a specific traumatic event. Symptoms of this condition, which can occur for many years after the traumatic event, include emotional withdrawal, hopelessness, irritability, mood swings, sleep problems, inability to concentrate, and an excessive startle response to noise. There is evidence that PTSD actually results in changes in the brain, possibly from long-term overexposure to stress hormones.
[For more information, seeWell-Connected Report #28, Anxiety Disorders .]
I read Alice Miller's latest book THE BODY NEVER LIES. Once again, Miller's on target discussion of the physical effects of long term abuse literally take my breath away. Some have called me a whiner & a crybaby. I have even been labeled a nutjob or crazy.

Frankly, its high time I stopped covering up my feelings - because doing so is what put me in this physical jail. I am grateful to people like Miller who validate my experience without judging it.
I had a priest try to hand me that "you need to move on" line once. It means hold no one accountable, that's what it means.

Correction: you become the one accountable for THEIR sins. That's morality devised in Hell. -
Kathy Krajco
This article might help those of you who don't have to deal with this living hell, to understand. Thank you for reading.

THE BODY REMEMBERS
by Faith Rayman, M.A.


Many who were abused in childhood were unable to protest, or tell about the abuse, or even express appropriate feelings. In order to survive, they searched for ways to cope with and protect themselves from the pain. They may have tried to remove themselves from the reality of the pain by going numb, going “away” or forgetting. But memories and feelings don’t go away. They go underground. Some found that the only place to bury the pain was in their bodies.

“Sally” was the third client in as many weeks to tell me of her painful experiences with sexual abuse and endometriosis. The doctors could not cure her chronic pelvic pain, and she saw them as impatient with her intractable illness. Her pain and shame over her history and present condition were inextricably entwined. In listening to her story of physical and emotional pain, I wanted to understand more about the connection between gynecological disorders and earlier sexual abuse.

Many in the field of mental health have written about the long-term effects of sexual abuse on a woman’s body, but what did researchers in the psychology and health professions have to say? Until recently, not much. Among the few research articles published on this issue is one by Jean Cunningham, et.al., in the Journal of Interpersonal Violence, June, 1988, that compared the medical complaints of 27 women with a history of sexual abuse to a control group of 33 women who reported no such history. They found that the sexually abused women, who also reported a much higher incidence of childhood physical abuse than the control group (44% vs. 9%), experienced a greater number of medical problems, including headaches and asthma, as well as gastrointestinal, gynecological and reproductive difficulties. Andrea Rapkin, et.al., (Obstetrics and Gynecology, July, 1990) also found a significant correlation between childhood physical as well as sexual abuse and chronic pain, especially pelvic pain.

Dr. Edward Walker, M.D., and his colleagues at the University of Washington are in the forefront of this research. In January, 1988, they published an article in the American Journal of Psychiatry exploring the relationship between chronic pelvic pain and childhood sexual abuse. They found that, out of 55 women undergoing exploratory laproscopies for specific pathologies, the 25 women with chronic pelvic pain had similar types and levels of pathology as the 30 women in the control group who did not present with chronic pain; however, they had double the incidence of remembered sexual abuse in their histories (64% as opposed to 23% for the control group), and a higher rate of sexual dysfunction and depression. In an article (unpublished as of June, 1991) exploring the relationship between the experience of chronic pelvic pain and the tendency to use dissociation as a coping mechanism, Dr. Walker and his associates offered a construct of the development of somatization, dissociation and pain symptoms in those with a history of early sexual abuse. They suggested that chronic pelvic pain may represent a body “memory” of the abuse that may not be recalled consciously. They also suggested that women experiencing this pain may benefit from psychotherapy, as well as pharmacotherapy. Others in the Seattle area agree.

Dr. Charles Thompson, M.D., and the team of physicians, psychologists, nurses, physical therapists and counselors at St. Luke’s Medical Center, have based their clinical practice on the belief that “the journey towards wholeness and well-being involves the integration of physical, psychological and spiritual factors.” Dr. Thompson asserts that
some physical manifestations of distress, such as chronic pain, premenstrual syndrome, autoimmune disorders and allergies are frequently associated with early trauma. He calls such physical disorders, “story tellers”—that is, ways to express traumatic memories and feelings that can find no other outlet.
Dr. Thompson and his colleagues use a team approach to assist those that are hurting to examine the sources of their pain and to become active in the healing process.


Those of us in the medical and mental health fields who are working with people whose physical and emotional distress may reflect previous trauma need to honor the messages that pain brings, whatever the source. We cannot know whether or not an individual woman’s physical pain is connected to previous psychological trauma. Even if there is such a connection, it could be quite harmful to assume that a woman consciously recalls the trauma, or that she is ready to discuss and deal with it. What we can do is to inquire and listen with open-mindedness and gentleness. We can allow time for a trusting relationship to be established before beginning to discuss this issue. We can also increase communication and referral between medical and mental health practitioners.

Sally is still in pain, but her shame is abating. She, and other women, are beginning to listen to the stories coming from within them, as all of us who work with women like Sally are increasingly listening to her and each other.

Faith Rayman, M.A. has a private practice where she works with people experiencing the effects of childhood trauma, people recovering from addictions and co-addictions, and people going through life-style, marital and career transitions.

Saturday, December 05, 2009

Obama's Misogynistic Associations Haunt Him

by Amy Siskind

It's not been a particularly good press week for two well known misogynists: Rick Warren and Larry Summers. Both men were early selections of President Obama.

If we are to judge our president by whom he surrounds himself with, then what do Obama's selections of Warren and Summers tell us? That Obama's version of diversity does not include gay and women's rights. And in fact, the selection of Warren and Summers will likely be a continual source of salt on the wound of inequality.

President Obama's Inauguration was presided over by Rick Warren. Although Warren is perhaps best known for his opposition to gay rights, he also believes that women are second class citizens.

Specifically, Warren's Saddleback Church has encouraged battered wives to stay in their abusive relationships. Hundreds of viewers wrote on our blog about their personal experiences at the hand of Rick Warren's church. Saddleback Church's advice to abused wives: "she" should make a better meal, or "she" should keep the home cleaner, or be a better wife - then "she" wouldn't deserve the beating that her husband delivered.

Warren is back in the news this past weekend for his ties with a Ugandan pastor who is helping to spearhead legislation which, if enacted, would result in the execution of HIV-positive gay men. Warren's unwillingness to condone this legislation sheds further light on his beliefs. How shocking it is to fathom that Obama would choose to be inaugurated by a man so antithetical to any brand of diversity.

Larry Summers, Obama's pick for Director of the National Economic Council, also made news this Sunday. This time a Boston Globe article revealed that Summers ignored warnings about investments while at Harvard, costing the University's endowment $1.8 billion.

Obama's 2008 selection of Summers was troubling. Summers is infamous for a speech he delivered while President at Harvard where he claimed that girls were genetically inferior in mathematics and science. Summers also has a history of being unable to work well with others - especially women.

In 1998, Brooksley Born, then chairwoman of the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission, warned Alan Greenspan, Robert Rubin, and Larry Summers of the risks inherent in not regulating derivatives - the esoteric instruments that would eventually tank our economy.

Michael Greenberger, a senior director at the commission at the time, noted: "Brooksley was this woman who was not playing tennis with these guys and not having lunch with these guys. There was a little bit of the feeling that this woman was not of Wall Street." Summers chastised Born that her suggestion would hurt financial markets, so shush! We all know how this story ended.

Summers also refused to heed the warnings of another woman, Iris Mack, while at Harvard. When Iris expressed concern about that Harvard was inadequately managing the risk inherent in derivative products held in its portfolio, what did Summers do? Fire her.

Finally, Obama's appointed Summers despite his ties to the same Wall Street firms that he is meant to watch over. In 2008, Summers was paid over $5 million from DE Shaw, one of the largest hedge funds in the world. Summers also received $2.7 million from some of the Wall Street banks that were recipients of government bailout money in 2008. Also in 2008, Summers was paid $135,000 by Goldman Sachs to deliver one speech -- the same Goldman Sachs that was the single biggest beneficiary of money that was drained out of AIG.

There's an old adage: you roll with dogs, you get fleas. Well President Obama must be pretty darn itchy right about now. Obama's selection of Warren and Summers is a constant reminder of where women and gays stand in Obama's pecking order.

Friday, December 04, 2009

When the Disease Eludes Diagnosis

By BARRON H. LERNER, M.D.

Lucy, one of my longtime patients, has a neurological ailment she believes I have been unable to adequately diagnose.

Although I hope to make further progress on her case, I have also told her that there may never be a definitive answer. Not surprisingly, she is feeling pretty frustrated with me.

Why do doctors and patients often approach the diagnosis of disease so differently?

Part of the answer lies in the concept of triage — the notion, originated in wartime, of caring for the sickest and most salvageable patients first. Once they were saved, attention could be turned to less drastic cases.

A similar strategy has evolved in emergency rooms, where physicians are trained to “rule in” or “rule out” severe conditions. Thus, doctors immediately consider heart attacks or pulmonary embolisms for patients with chest pain, and intestinal rupture for those with abdominal pain.

But what happens when these conditions are ruled out? In such cases, doctors proceed to search for less dire (and, it must be said, more mundane) diagnoses. The trouble is that at this stage, some physicians, busy with other patients and duties, lose interest.

For example, many patients with chest pain carry a diagnosis of costochondritis (inflammation of the chest wall bones) or gastroesophageal reflux (regurgitation of stomach acid into the esophagus).

These are real conditions. But they tend to generate little interest from many physicians, who may refer to them as “wastebasket diagnoses,” offered when nothing more serious has turned up.

The frustration of patients who believe that the medical profession takes these types of ailments too lightly has led groups of them to form alliances to publicize their illnesses. Foremost among them are fibromyalgia, a syndrome involving muscular and other pains, and chronic fatigue syndrome, which has recently been given increased credibility by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Part of the problem with these conditions is that existing treatments are not nearly as effective as those for, say, heart attacks and pneumonia. As a result, doctors may grow irritated when patients continually complain of symptoms that cannot be “cured.”

Patients’ frustration may rise even more when their conditions are especially obscure. I once had a patient who complained of persistent drenching sweats that forced her to change her bedclothes several times a night.

Upon learning of this problem, I first went into triage mode, ruling out possible dangerous causes, including tuberculosis, a thyroid abnormality and rare tumors that release hormones. I referred her to a gynecologist on the chance that she was getting hot flashes decades after her menopause.

When all the tests were negative, my patient was understandably upset, even angry. “No doctor that I have spoken to has been able to tell me what it is,” she said, as I remember. She even called a doctor on a local radio show for his opinion.

I recalled this story when I learned recently that my longtime patient Lucy’s new neurologist was questioning whether she had multiple sclerosis, a diagnosis she has carried for more than 25 years. Since I have known her, Lucy has had painful and weak legs that necessitate a walker.

Rather than simply corroborating her existing diagnosis, this doctor had thought outside the box, noting that Lucy’s relatively stable condition — and her lack of brain lesions on an M.R.I., a test not available at the time of her initial diagnosis — warranted a new perspective.

At first, Lucy was excited too. After all, being told you may not have a serious disease like multiple sclerosis is surely good news.

But while the neurologist had correctly questioned the diagnosis, she had a harder time finding a new one. Lucy became discouraged. “I want to know,” she told me. “I point-blank asked the neurologist, ‘What is it?’ And the only answer she can give me is: ‘I don’t know. I’m not sure.’ ”

Eventually, the neurology team decided that Lucy had an atypical form of multiple sclerosis, one that caused unusual neurological symptoms and was present in the spinal cord but not the brain. Yet the doctors admitted that this diagnosis generated more questions than answers about Lucy’s prognosis and her future treatment.

While trying to be as sympathetic as possible, I find myself reminding Lucy of the limits of certainty in medicine. Despite enormous advances in technology, some diagnoses may remain elusive. I also told her that it was highly unlikely her doctors missed diagnosing a disease that could have been successfully treated. But she remains convinced that she deserves to know exactly what she has.

So we will continue to search.

Barron H. Lerner teaches medicine and public health at the Columbia University Medical Center.

SOURCE

Tuesday, December 01, 2009

The Heavy Cost of Chronic Stress

One thing 15 years of an unpredictable. excruciating disability has taught me - is to prioritize. Get straight what is important and what isn't.

As a single, divorced mom and an advocate for abused women I get overloaded with requests. Of course my children come first. That is something I make very clear.

But I am good at my advocacy. And being good at something can be a blessing and a curse.

Very often I tend to overload myself with work. However, in the years since I was paralyzed on the left side and couldn't walk to the last few years where I have been extricating myself from a very abusive & controlling partner - I've learned to say NO.


I don't ask much for myself. Like I said, my children are my primary focus and then my health. The latter tends to DEMAND I pay attention or it literally makes me sicker than the white noise of physical pain and feeling lousy I do most of the time. My friends are always telling me to do more nice things for myself and to stick up for myself more. Often I just want to crawl into bed with a pain killer, shut my bedroom door and hope that I fall asleep and the world goes away for a while.

During the first few years of my illness I took so many blood tests and got so many scans I thought for sure I was going to glow in the dark. I got very intimate with the inside of my body and its chemistry. One relief and shock was that from years of abuse from childhood & young adulthood, my brain chemistry had changed. The untreated profound depression of my adolescence and teen years had been cemented by verbal, emotional, sexual and psychological abuse (along with physical abuse).

I thought I was a strong person who could fight it on her own. Until my body gave me a boot in the derriere and told me I was full of it and getting help wasn't a choice - it was a direct order.

I used to be a stress junkie. It's one of the things I loved about New York when I moved here 30 years ago. The constant sources of good stress. (and bad stress) We all need stress to live and to be motivated. As I get older, the demands and the stress sometimes become overwhelming. I have some in my life who get very angry with me that I don't do things on time or fast enough. However, I have to make choices. It's not always easy or fun. But necessary.

I am not who I was. But I am who I am.


By ERICA GOODE

It is instructive to consider the plight of the Pacific salmon.

As the fish leap, flop and struggle upstream to spawn, their levels of cortisol, a potent stress hormone, surge, providing energy to fight the current. But the hormone also leads the salmon to stop eating. Their digestive tracts wither away. Their immune systems break down. And after laying their eggs, they die of exhaustion and infection, their bodies worn out by the journey.

Salmon cannot help being stressed out. They are programmed to die, their systems propelled into overdrive by evolutionary design.

Humans, on the other hand, are usually subject to stresses of their own making, the chronic, primarily psychological, pressures of modern life. Yet they also suffer consequences when the body's biological mechanisms for handling stress go awry.

Prolonged or severe stress has been shown to weaken the immune system, strain the heart, damage memory cells in the brain and deposit fat at the waist rather than the hips and buttocks (a risk factor for heart disease, cancer and other illnesses), said Dr. Bruce S. McEwen, director of the neuroendocrinology laboratory at the Rockefeller University and the author of a new book, "The End of Stress as We Know It." Stress has been implicated in aging, depression, heart disease, rheumatoid arthritis and diabetes, among other illnesses.

Researchers have known for many decades that physical stress takes a toll on the body. But only relatively recently have the profound effects of psychological stress on health been widely acknowledged. Two decades ago, many basic scientists scoffed at the notion that mental state could affect illness. The link between mind and body was considered murky territory, best left to psychiatrists.

But in the last decade, researchers have convincingly demonstrated that psychological stress can increase vulnerability to disease and have begun to understand how that might occur.

"If you would have said to me back in 1982 that stress could modulate how the immune system worked, I would have said, `Forget about it,' " said Dr. Ronald Glaser, an immunologist at Ohio State University. The more researchers have learned, the clearer it has become that stress may be a thread tying together many illnesses that were previously thought to be unrelated.

"What used to be thought of as pathways that led pretty explicitly to one particular disease outcome can now be seen as leading to a whole lot of different outcomes," said Dr. Robert M. Sapolsky, a professor of neurology at Stanford.
Central to this new understanding is a novel conception of stress, developed by Dr. McEwen, who has been studying the subject for more than three decades. According to his model, it is not stress per se that is harmful. Rather, the problems associated with stress result from a complicated interaction between the demands of the outside world and the body's capacity to manage potential threats.

That capacity can be influenced by heredity and childhood experience; by diet, exercise and sleep patterns; by the presence or absence of close personal relationships; by income level and social status; and by the piling on of normal stresses to the point that they overload the system. In moderate amounts, the scientists argue, stress can be benign, even beneficial, and most people are equipped to deal with it.

Preparing to give a speech, take a test or avoid a speeding car, the body undergoes an elaborate series of adjustments. Physiological processes essential in mobilizing a response — the cardiovascular system, the immune system, the endocrine glands and brain regions involved in emotion and memory — are recruited into action. Nonessential functions like reproduction and digestion are put off till later. Adrenaline, and later cortisol, both stress hormones secreted by the adrenal glands, flood the body. Heart rate and blood pressure rise, respiration quickens, oxygen flows to the muscles, and immune cells prepare to rush to the site of an injury.

When the speech is delivered, the test taken or the car avoided, another complex set of adjustments calms things down, returning the body to normal.

This process of "equilibrium through change" is called allostasis, and it is essential for survival. But it was developed, Dr. McEwen and Dr. Sapolsky point out, for the dangers humans might have encountered in a typical day on the savannah, the sudden appearance of a lion, for example, or a temporary shortage of antelope meat.

Blaring car alarms, controlling bosses, two-career marriages, six-mile traffic jams and rude salesclerks were simply not part of the plan. When stress persists for too long or becomes too severe, Dr. McEwen said, the normally protective mechanisms become overburdened, a condition that he refers to as allostatic load. The finely tuned feedback system is disrupted, and over time it runs amok, causing damage.

Work that Dr. McEwen and his colleagues have conducted with rats nicely illustrates this wear-and-tear effect. In the studies, the rats were placed in a small compartment, their movement restricted for six hours a day during their normal resting time. The first time the rats were restrained, Dr. McEwen said, their cortisol levels rose as their stress response moved into full gear. But after that, their cortisol production switched off earlier each day as they became accustomed to the restraint.

That might have been the end of the story. But the researchers also found that at 21 days, the rats began to show the effects of chronic stress. They grew anxious and aggressive. Their immune systems became slower to fight off invaders. Nerve cells in the hippocampus, a brain region involved in memory, atrophied. The production of new hippocampal neurons stopped.

Dr. Sheldon Cohen, a professor of psychology at Carnegie Mellon University, has found that people respond much the same way. Among volunteers inoculated with a cold virus, those who reported life stresses that continued for more than one month like unemployment or family problems were more likely to develop colds than those who reported stress lasting less than a month. The longer the stress persisted, the greater the risk of illness.

Allostatic load is often made worse, Dr. McEwen said, by how people respond to stress, eating fatty foods, staying late at work, avoiding the treadmill or drinking to excess. "The fact is that we're now living in a world where our systems are not allowed a chance to rest, to go back to base line," he said. "They're being driven by excess calories, by inadequate sleep, by lack of exercise, by smoking, by isolation or frenzied competition."

The Chemistry: Shrinking Cells, Turned-Off Responses
Doctors sometimes dismiss stress-related complaints as "all in the patient's head." In a sense, they are right. The brain, specifically the amygdala, detects the first signs of danger, as demonstrated in now-classic studies by Dr. Joseph LeDoux of New York University. Other brain areas evaluate the threat's importance, decide how to respond and remember when and where the danger occurred, increasing the chances of avoiding it next time.

So it is not surprising that when the stress system is derailed, the brain is a target for damage. A decade of research has demonstrated that sustained stress and the resulting overproduction of cortisol can have chilling effects on the hippocampus, a horseshoe-shaped brain structure intimately involved in memory formation.

Scientists say they believe that the hippocampus plays an active role in registering not only events, but also their context, an important task in the face of danger. In stressful situations, the hippocampus also helps turn off the stress response after the threat has subsided. But high levels of cortisol, studies have shown, can shrink nerve cells in the hippocampus and halt the creation of new hippocampal neurons. These changes are associated with aging and memory problems. Some evidence also links a smaller hippocampus with post-traumatic stress disorder, depression and sexual abuse in childhood, though the meaning of this size difference is still being debated.

Like other hormones, cortisol normally rises and falls with daily rhythms, its production higher in the morning and lower in the evening. Prolonged or severe stress appears to disrupt the cycle. Chronically stressed people sometimes have higher base line cortisol levels and produce too much or too little of it at the wrong times.

One result, recent studies indicate, is that fat is deposited at the abdomen rather than the hips or the buttocks. One of cortisol's primary functions is to help mobilize energy in times of acute stress by releasing glucose into the blood. But when cortisol remains chronically elevated, it acts, along with high insulin levels, to send fat into storage at the waist. This makes sense if a famine looms. But it is bad news for anyone who wants to minimize the risk of heart disease, cancer and other illnesses.

Studies have shown that excess cortisol secretion in animals increases visceral fat. And Dr. Elissa S. Epel at the University of California at San Francisco has found that even in slender women, stress, cortisol and belly fat seem to go together.

The notion that being stressed makes people sick is a popular one, and most people subscribe to some version of it. Come down with the flu in the midst of a messy divorce or a frantic period at the office, and someone is bound to blame stress.

But it was not until the 1980's and early 90's that scientists began to discover the mechanisms that might lie behind the mind and body link. Investigators uncovered nerves that connect the brain with the spleen and thymus, organs important in immune responses, and they established that nerve cells could affect the activity of infection-fighting white blood cells.

Scientists also found that cytokines, proteins produced by immune cells, could influence brain processes. Among other things, the proteins appeared able to activate the second major phase of the stress response, the so-called hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal, or H.P.A., axis. In this chemical sequence, the hypothalamus, situated in the forebrain, dispatches chemical signals to the pituitary, which in turn secretes the stress hormone ACTH, prompting the adrenal glands to produce cortisol. Much remains unknown about how the brain, the endocrine system and the immune system interact, and some of what is known is not well understood. For example, high levels of cortisol have long been known to shut off the production and action of cytokines, which initiate the immune response. At normal levels, cortisol can enhance immunity by increasing the production of inflammation-fighting cytokines. Yet in some cases, it seems, cortisol does not properly shut down the immune system under stress, allowing the continued production of cytokines that promote inflammation. These cytokines have been linked to heart disease, depression, stroke and other illnesses.

Still, scientists can watch stress hammer away at the immune system in the laboratory. Dr. Glaser of Ohio State and his wife, Dr. Janice Kiecolt-Glaser, found that small wounds took an average of nine days longer to heal in women who cared for patients with Alzheimer's disease than in women who were not under similar stress. In another study, arguments between husbands and wives were accompanied by increases in stress hormones and immunological changes over a 24-hour period.

Stress also seems to make people more likely to contract some infectious illnesses. Dr. Cohen of Carnegie Mellon has spent years inoculating intrepid volunteers with cold and influenza viruses, and his findings offer strong evidence that stressed people are more likely to become infected and had more severe symptoms after becoming ill.

A direct link between stress and more serious diseases, however, has been more difficult to establish, Dr. Cohen said. Recent studies have provided increased support for the notion that stress contributes to heart disease, and researchers have tied psychological stress, directly or indirectly, to diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, fibromyalgia, severe depression and other mental disorders. But the influence of chronic stress on other diseases like cancer remains controversial. All the same, Dr. Cohen said, "The evidence that stress puts people at risk for disease is a lot better than it was 10 years ago."

The Risks From an Early Start, Lifelong Effects
Why do some people seem more vulnerable to life's pressures than others? Personality and health habits play a role. And severe stress in early life appears to cast a long shadow.

Dr. Michael Meaney of McGill University and his colleagues have found that rat pups intensively licked and groomed by their mothers were bolder and secreted lower levels of the stress hormone ACTH in stressful situations than rats lacking such attention — an equanimity that lasted throughout their lives. (Cuddled pups, the researchers found in another study, were also smarter than their neglected peers.)

In humans, physical and sexual abuse and other traumas in childhood have been associated with a more pronounced response to stress later in life. In one study, Dr. Charles Nemeroff, a psychiatrist at Emory University, and his colleagues found that women who were physically or sexually abused as children secreted more of two stress hormones in response to a mildly stressful situation than women who had not been abused.

Yet perhaps the best indicator of how people are likely to be affected by stress is their position in the social hierarchy. In subordinate male monkeys, for example, the stress of being servile to their alpha counterparts causes damage in the hippocampus. And dominant monkeys who are repeatedly moved from social group to social group, forcing them to constantly re-establish their position, also exhibit severe stress and are more likely to develop atherosclerosis, according to studies by Dr. Jay Kaplan of Wake Forest University School of Medicine.

Being low in the hierarchy also affects reproduction, presumably because evolution dictated that in times of stress, other factors were more pressing than procreation. In a recent study, Dr. Kaplan found that the constant low-level harassment by dominant female monkeys shut down reproductive function in subordinate females and built up fat deposits in their arteries.

It would be nice to think that humans are less chained to their social rankings. But alas, researchers have found this not to be the case. A wealth of studies shows that the risk for many diseases increases with every step down the socioeconomic scale, even when factors like smoking and access to health care are taken into account.

A real estate mogul living in a Park Avenue penthouse has a better health prognosis than the head of a small company in an upscale condo a few blocks away. And a renter in a one-bedroom apartment on the Upper West Side of Manhattan will be a tier or two lower still in health expectations.

Even people's perceptions of their relative standings in society affect their disease risk. In one study, led by Dr. Nancy E. Adler, also at the University of California at San Francisco, women who placed themselves higher on the social ladder reported better physical health and had lower resting cortisol levels and less abdominal fat than women who placed themselves on lower rungs.

No matter what one's circumstances, of course, some stress in life is inevitable. But illness is not, Dr. McEwen said. A variety of strategies can help reduce disease risk.

Reaching for a gallon of ice cream to soothe the tension of a family argument is not one of them, however, nor is forgoing exercise in favor of curling up on the sofa for an eight-hour marathon of "Law and Order." The best ways to cope, Dr. McEwen said, turn out to be the time-honored ones: eat sensibly, get plenty of sleep, exercise regularly, stop at one martini and stay away from cigarettes. "It's a matter of making choices in your life," he said.

Sunday, November 29, 2009

Lack Of Awareness Disorder (L.O.A.D.)

I had the good fortune to stumble on Ms. Lefave's blog a while back. Her writing on psychology & psychiatry is insightful and laser-like in cutting through the b.s. My kinda girl.

She absolutely nails the "get over it" crowd -- those pathology sympathizers who think victims of emotional, psychological trauma and emotional rape are just being 'overly dramatic.' She also nails the perpetrators of the trauma who want you to ACT LIKE IT NEVER HAPPENED and smear you for being angry and demanding accountability.

Especially the CLUELESS therapists who try to treat sufferers and end up revictimizing them all over again.

You Go, Ms. Lefave!


By Patricia Lefave, Labeled, D.D.(P)


What is L.O.A.D.?


Well, it is described by many of the family members as a frightening altered state much like the hypnotic trance or brainwashed state of cult members. It tends to strike the upper classes just as much, if not more than any other class, the highly educated, and more sophisticated members of society, which is what makes it so worrisome to the family members of those afflicted.


The Characteristics of The Disease Checklist:

If you observe five or more of these signs in a particular subject, it should be an indication that L.O.A.D. may be present and just out of the incubation stage of the disease making it still manageable with immediate treatment.

If the subject is presenting any of the following, he or she should be detained for further assessment.


1. A tendency towards an arrogant certainty about an understanding of the lives and feelings of others, especially complete strangers.


2. Disdain for others not included in the LOAD sufferers' group/family or organization.


3. A need to believe he or she has total control of other people and situations.


4. Denial of any evidence which puts the beliefs of the sufferer in question.


5. A tendency to regress easily to the level of flocks, herds or pack animals.


6. A display of territorial thinking or behavior.


7. A tendency to attempt to "hide" an obvious truth or evidence in order to defend an untenable position or the current social status quo, even when doing so harms everyone.


8. An apparent inability to hear doublethink or doublespeak, even when it is coming out of the sufferer's own mouth.


9. A belief that he or she is somehow magically ''hidden'' and cannot be seen or heard, even though ten feet (three meters) or less separates him or her from the "other" from whom he or she is supposedly ''hiding.''


10. A belief that his/her personal concrete experience in life represents an abstract truth that can be applied to all others universally and any disagreement from any of those others should be invalidated immediately.


11. A tendency to label others in order to create a closed system of containment designed to keep the fears and anxiety of the LOAD sufferer at bay.


12. A refusal to communicate directly and honestly and an exhibited preference for talking about, or sometimes AT, anyone who disagrees with his/her judgments.


13. A tendency to enlist the aid of others (usually covertly) in order to force those disagree to accept his/her version of "reality" by means of the application of group pressure.


14. An automatic, well entrenched, invalidating response to any argument or suggestion that the LOAD sufferer could ever be wrong about anything.


15. Speaks and thinks in absolute abstract terms, avoiding concrete details.


16. A tendency to contract the anal muscles in an unnatural manner.


17. Operates from behind a haughty, superior or rigid facade.


18. Often social climbs in order to validate delusions about superior understanding or worth as a human being.


19. Inappropriate affects:
Particularly predominant is flat affect. (no emotional response at all to anything) eg: You tell them you have been assaulted by Uncle Bob, or even that something positive happened to you and they "humour" you, wearing a mask like face, "Oh really. How interesting ." He or she may even make a side remark to a friend in your presence such as, "the poor thing."
20. Inappropriate Laughter or Smiling:
eg: You are being harassed by a contemptuous group of people on a subway or other public transportation and the onlookers decide to join in the "fun." You dare to react with anger and complain about being abused by others without reason and the LOAD sufferers among them smile or smirk, their little insane eyeballs twinkling with high amusement about your complaint of their behaviour.
Disdain or contempt:
You keep trying to tell your psychiatrist (who really has no time to listen to your nonsense)your therapist, your friends, or your relatives the truth about what happened to you and are treated with more and more contempt for refusing to "let it go" and stop trying to be heard.
Mocking and Ridiculing:
Especially when presented along with symptom 5.
21. Unrealistic fantastic view of "authority" figures. Eg: Parents never lie, teachers aren't abusive, doctors can't be wrong, bosses aren't ever jerks, landlords don't break laws and religious leaders can't have hidden agendas.

22. LOAD sufferers will often go to any lengths to reduce the awareness of others as a reaction to feeling threatened with self awareness, or of experiencing an unwanted increase in their own awareness. There is an unrealistic ongoing expectation that others will deny their own experience and feelings if the LOAD sufferer simply pretends it is not "real." The expectation appears to be that the invalidate other will adapt him/herself to embrace the LOAD sufferer's delusional belief system.


23. In times of distress, LOAD sufferers tend to close ranks and seek reinforcement in their trance-like brainwashed state from other sufferers who are more than wiling to support their beliefs, needs and Dis-ease.
As you can see, this is an extremely difficult disorder to treat as the defense mechanisms of the acute sufferer are so well entrenched it is nearly impossible to to locate a chink in his or her psychological armor.

All we can really do is keep trying and continue to expose the pathology of this terrible disorder to the world at large in the hope that public awareness will promote the change and encourage offerings of research funding which will allow us to search for a cure.

We all need to break the silence in order to generate the interest that will help us move towards a cure for these poor unfortunate self deluded people.


It should be noted that many LOAD sufferers often have a dual diagnosis. Many have been previously diagnosed with A.P.D. (Arrogant Personality Disorder) In such advanced cases, prognosis tends to be rather poor and the disease may only be managed to the terminal stage, which occurs often as a result of toxicity from permanent anal stricture.

Though not all LOAD sufferers die of their Dis-eases, in extreme cases, carrying this kind of LOAD for too long can be terminal.


READ THE WHOLE GREAT POST BY CLICKING HERE!

Saturday, November 28, 2009

The Swiss Might Get it Right!

By Imogen Foulkes

Swiss voters go to the polls later to decide on a proposal to ban the building of minarets in their country.

The proposal is backed by the Swiss People's Party, the largest party in parliament, and by Christian groups.


They say minarets would be the first sign of the Islamisation of Switzerland.


The Swiss government is urging voters to reject a ban. There are 400,000 Muslims in Switzerland, and just four minarets across the country.

Islam is the most widespread religion after Christianity, but it remains relatively hidden.

There are unofficial Muslim prayer rooms, and planning for new minarets is almost always refused.

The proposal is for a one-line addition to the Swiss constitution, stating that the construction of minarets is forbidden.

Supporters of a ban claim allowing minarets would represent the growth of an ideology and a legal system - Sharia law - which are incompatible with Swiss democracy.


Opinion polls ahead of the vote are close, with signs that a small majority would reject the ban.

That would be a relief to the Swiss government which fears banning minarets would cause unrest among the Muslim community, and damage Switzerland's relations with Islamic countries.

Amnesty International has warned that the ban would violate Switzerland's obligations to freedom of religious expression.

Swiss Muslim Elham Manea points to the recent construction of Sikh temples and Serbian Orthodox churches and says a ban just on minarets is discriminatory.

"If you are telling me that we are going to ban all religious symbols from all religious buildings, I would not have a problem with that.

"But if you are just telling me that we are going to target only the Muslims, not the Christians, not the Jews, not the Sikhs, only the Muslims, then I have a problem with it because it is discrimination."

Muslim respect
Most of Switzerland's Muslims come from former Yugoslavia, and there is no history of Islamic extremism, but supporters of a ban say minarets are far more than religious architecture.

They claim allowing them would be a sign that Islamic law is accepted in Switzerland.

Member of parliament Oskar Freysinger rejects the charge of discrimination.

"The Muslims as normal human beings are worth my respect - it is not a problem.

"I have a real problem with Islam, with the Islamic law, with the political and legal aspect of this religion."

In recent years many countries in Europe have been debating their relationship with Islam, and how best to integrate their Muslim populations.

France focused on the headscarf; in Germany there was controversy over plans to build one of Europe's largest mosques in Cologne.

SOURCE

Friday, November 27, 2009

Does That Doll Come in the Beheaded Version?

Boycott Burqa Barbie
by Phyllis Chesler

What will they think of next? A be-headed doll?

That’s right. I am talking about the new Burqa Barbie [1]doll which is now on display in Florence, Italy, to celebrate the fiftieth anniversary of the Barbie doll. As my colleague over at weaselzippers [2] wonders: Will clean-cut Ken now come (pun intended, ‘tis mine) with four burqa’ed Barbie doll wives?

Ah, I am such a Grinch. After all, the Burqa Barbie is being auctioned off for the Save the Children charity.

Save the Children? Surely, you must be jesting. I would like to save the children from this as well as from every other Barbie doll. (Yes, I know Barbie has diversified and now comes in every color and profession). But naked, even Doctor Barbie is still a pagan goddess or fertility figure but one with absolutely no relationship to female biology or reality.

Barbies are always anatomically impossible: their feet are pre-shaped for high heels, their breasts are high, firm, and perky—like Playboy dolls or surgically enhanced Hollywood stars. Bikini Barbie.

These dolls were so retro—or so I always thought. Well, shut my mouth, those were the good old days of sex, drugs, and rock ‘n roll. Now, Barbie is swathed, shrouded, in a burqa; now, she is even more hopelessly retro.

A woman, a girl, in a chador, chadari, burqa, cannot see that well. You cannot hear what she is saying. She cannot hear you. A woman in a burqa can’t run, or even walk that well. She stumbles. Inside, she has to balance a baby, a shopping bag, maybe a pair of glasses perched on her nose, slipping. If it’s hot, she is sweltering. If it’s sunny, she is still deprived of sunlight and Vitamin D. The burqa violates a woman’s human rights. It poses a danger to a woman’s health, both mental and medical.

The bikini and the burqa: What ever happened to women’s freedom?

I’ll tell you. While the bikini (especially as a symbol of pornography, prostitution, and promiscuity) was nevah (I say this with my best Barbra Streisand Brooklyn accent) a symbol of freedom, the western secular state never forced any woman to wear one; nor did her family. And, if a woman refused to wear a bikini, no one flogged, stoned, or honor murdered her. These things are happening to girls and women today all over the Islamic/Islamist world. They are happening in the West as well when young Muslim girls refuse to wear a modest headscarf.

A wonderful Muslim feminist hero just stayed with me for a week. She is a lawyer and an author. Her name is Seyran Ates, she is a Turkish-German, and she lives in Berlin. Like Algerian-American professor Marnia Lazreg, whose book about the Islamic Veil I’ve previously discussed, Ates absolutely opposes the veil in any form. She will not wear a headscarf. Ates is a religious Muslim woman.

Mattel: take Burqa Barbie off the market.

Parents: Boycott it.

Calling all Charities: Save the children from it.

This just in from Marcia Pappas, President of New York State NOW:

“As feminists we believe that women must be able to make their own choices and that includes choices about the clothing they wear. But the burqa is more than a choice. Women are forced to wear the burqua or risk being murdered. Mattel should be ashamed. Making a profit by selling a doll that is clearly wearing a symbol of violence is not acceptable and there should be a public outcry to take this doll off the market.”
And, I love the comments on this piece. What next? A Jihad Ken, etc.

SOURCE

Copy and Paste this letter into your email and send it to the following:
foundation@mattel.com,
prowl@pumapac.org,
info@team-csd.com, twebster@savechildren.org,
info@sothebysinstitute.com, info.ny@sothebysinstitute.com,


Dear Mattel,

As an American woman [optional: and a member of Puma PAC, People United Means Action], I have a couple of questions about your marvelous new Slave Barbie Collector’s Item:
  • Does she come with stones?
  • Does her head come off?
  • Does she come with a tiny vial of acid?
  • Does she need to be accompanied by a man in order to leave the store?
  • Who gets flogged if she takes her Burqa off in public? Doll? Or child?
  • Who arranges Burqa Barbie’s marriage?
  • If Burqa Barbie is “honor killed” do I get a refund?

The Burkha Slave Barbie is an outrage. My family, friends, and I will be boycotting ALL of Mattel’s products this holiday season, including, of course, Barbie, but also Hot Wheels, Fisher Price, and American Girl.

We will DEFINITELY NOT BE BUYING any toys from Mattel for girls ever again after this outrageous insult to women and girls and to the women who fight for women’s freedom and rights worldwide.


Sincerely,

Your Name



Do the PROWL. Tell your friends.


SOURCE: Thanks to FLBarbara and BJ Kling.



IF YOU'RE ON AN AGGREGATE AND CAN'T SEE THE ABOVE VIDEO - CLICK HERE.

VIDEO HAT TIP: Uppity Woman